To Walk or Not to Walk? How Modern Parents Organize the Independent Mobility of Children
Abstract
This article discusses children’s independent mobility in the psychological development of children and its contribution to the physical and psychological well-being of children through physical activity, the development of cognitive, social and other skills, increasing psychological stability, the maintenance of relationships, and joint activities with peers. We consider the concept of “parental licenses” for children’s independent mobility, the process of obtaining them by children, and “accident-free mobility”, which is usually a requirement for obtaining a license at the next level. The main factors influencing the willingness of parents to grant children independent mobility around the place of residence and beyond are discussed, including the age of the child, the number of children in the family, the characteristics of the area, and parental fears about the physical or social environmental. The article provides data on the global trend of reducing the independent mobility of children and its comparison with Russian indicators, discusses changes in the lifestyles of children and families of different generations and the digital mediation of parental control over children’s movements (“smart mobility”). The results of quantitative and pilot qualitative research are presented, including a quantitative assessment of licenses for independent mobility of Moscow schoolchildren aged 12–15 years (539 respondents) and a qualitative analysis of young adults’ responses to open questions about their childhood experience of independent mobility (34 respondents, Moscow). The city acts as a territory for play, communication, learning, leisure, and future planning for children; the experience of the urban space without parents plays an important role in their development. The complexity and multidimensionality of the contribution of independent movement in childhood to various aspects of their further socialization, including the development of agency, are discussed, and prospects for further qualitative and quantitative research of children’s independent movements in a broader context are formulated.
Downloads
References
Бочавер А. А., Корзун А. Н., Поливанова К. Н. (2017) Уличный досуг детей и подростков // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. Т. 14. No 3. С. 470–490.
Бочавер А. А., Резниченко С. И. (2018) Внедомашнее пространство как источник удовлетворения базовых и высших потребностей // Психологический журнал. Т. 39. No 6. С. 27–36.
Глазков К. П. (2016) Лицензия на независимую мобильность школьников в контексте отношений с родителями // Городские исследования и практики. Т. 1. No 4. С. 37–46.
Осорина М. В. (2019) Секретный мир детей в пространстве мира взрослых. СПб.: Питер. 448 с.
Поливанова К. Н., Бочавер А. А., Павленко К. В., Сивак Е. В. (2020) Образование за стенами школы. Как родители проектируют образовательное пространство детей. М.: Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ. 384 с.
Сергеева О. В., Лактюхина Е. Г. (2019) Социальные аспекты цифровизации детской городской мобильности // Журнал исследований социальной политики. Т. 17. No 4. С. 507–524.
Сивак Е. В., Глазков К. П. (2017) Жизнь вне класса: повседневная мобильность школьников // Вопросы образования. Т. 2. С. 113–133.
Alparone F. R., Pacilli M. G. (2012) On Children’s Independent Mobility: The Interplay of Demographic, Environmental, and Psychosocial Factors // Children’s Geographies. No. 10(1). P. 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2011.638173.
American Academy of Pediatrics (2007) The Importance of Play in Promoting Healthy Child Development and Maintaining Strong Parent–Child Bonds // Pediatrics. Vol. 119 (1). P. 182–191.
Braun V., Clarke V. (2006) Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology // Qualitative Research in Psychology. Vol. 3. No. 2. P. 77–101.
Brown B., Mackett R., Gong Y., Kitazawa K., Paskins J. (2008) Gender Differences in Children’s Pathways to Independent Mobility // Children’s Geographies. Vol. 6. No. 4. P. 385–401. DOI: 10.1080/14733280802338080
Castonguay G., Jutras S. (2009) Children’s Appreciation of Outdoor Places in a Poor Neighborhood // Journal of Environmental Psychology. Vol. 29. P. 101–109.
Clark C., Uzzell D. L. (2002) The Affordances of the Home, Neighbourhood, School and Town Centre for Adolescents // Journal of Environmental Psychology. Vol. 22. P. 95–108.
Egli V., Villanueva K., Donnellan N., Mackay L., Forsyth E., Zinn C., Kytta M., Smith M. (2019) Understanding Children’s Neighbourhood Destinations: Presenting the Kids-Pond Framework // Children’s Geographies. Vol. 18 (4). P. 420–434. DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2019.1646889
Fotel T., Thomsen T. (2004) The Surveillance of Children’s Mobility // Surveillance and Society. Vol. 1 (4). P. 535–554.
Fyhri A., Hjorthol R., Mackett R. L., Fotel T. N., Kyttä M. (2011) Children’s Active Travel and Independent Mobility in Four Countries: Development, Social Contributing Trends and Measures // Transport Policy. Vol. 18 (5). P. 703–710.
Hillman M., Adams J., Whitelegg J. (1990) One False Move... A Study of Children’s Independent Mobility. London: Policy Studies Institute.
Horton J., Christensen P., Kraftl P., Hadfield-Hill S. (2014) ‘Walking... Just Walking’: How Children and Young People’s Everyday Pedestrian Practices Matter // Social & Cultural Geography. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 94–115. DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2013.864782
Korpela K., Kytta M., Hartig T. (2002) Restorative Experience, Self-Regulation, and Children’s Place Preferences // Journal of Environmental Psychology. Vol. 22. P. 387–398
Kyttä M. (2004) The Extent of Children’s Independent Mobility and the Number of Actualized Affordances as Criteria for Child-Friendly Environment // Journal of Environmental Psychology. Vol. 24. No. 2. P. 179–198.
Marzi I., Demetriou Y., Reimers A. K. (2018) Social and Physical Environmental Correlates of Independent Mobility in Children: A Systematic Review Taking Sex/Gender Differences into Account // International Journal of Health Geographics. Vol. 17. No. 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-018-0145-9
Mutz M., Müller J. (2016) Mental Health Benefits of Outdoor Adventures: Results from Two Pilot Studies // Journal of Adolescence. Vol. 49. P. 105–114.
Pacilli M. G., Giovannelli I., Prezza M., Augimeri L. L. (2013) Children and the Public Realm: Antecedents and Consequences of Independent Mobility in a Group of 11- to 13-Year-Old Italian Children // Children’s Geographies. Vol. 11(4). P. 377–393.
Piccininni C., Michaelson V., Janssen I., Pickett W. (2018) Outdoor Play and Nature Connectedness as Potential Correlates of Internalized Mental Health Symptoms Among Canadian Adolescents // Preventive Medicine. Vol. 112. P. 168–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.04.020
Prezza M., Alparone F. R., Cristallo C., Luigi S. (2005) Parental Perception of Social Risk and of Positive Potentiality of Outdoor Autonomy for Children: the Development of Two Instruments // Journal of Environmental Psychology. Vol. 25. P. 437–453.
Prezza M., Pilloni S., Morabito C., Sersante C., Alparone F. R., Giuliani M. V. (2001) The Influence of Psychosocial and Environmental Factors on Children’s Independent Mobility and Relationship to Peer Frequentation // Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology. Vol. 11. P. 435–450.
Shaw B., Bicket M., Elliott B., Fagan-Watson B., Mocca E., Hillman M. (2015) Children’s Independent Mobility: An International Comparison and Recommendations for Action. Режим доступа: http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/15650/1/PSI_finalreport_2015.pdf (дата обращения: 10.05.2020).
Siibak A. (2019) Digital Parenting and the Datafied Child // Educating 21st Century Children: Emotional Well-Being in the Digital Age / T. Burns, F. Gottchalk (eds.). Paris, Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing. P. 103–121.
Sobel D. (1990) A Place in the World: Adults’ Memories of Childhood Special Places // Children’s Environments Quarterly. Vol. 7. P. 5–12.
