Environmental Views and Practices in Early and Modern Buddhism

  • Vlada A. Volkova Lomonosov Moscow State University (MSU)
Keywords: anthropocentrism, Buddha, engaged Buddhism, ethics, ecology, environmentalism

Abstract

In Western countries today, there is a tendency to associate Buddhism with concern for the environment, nonharm, and vegetarianism. These views reflect the fact that many modern Buddhist organizations address global environmental problems and offer their own solutions. Nevertheless, some researchers of Buddhism note that traditionally Buddhism is anthropocentric and aims to help people achieve liberation from samsara and does not address environmental issues. Other researchers address fundamental Buddhist concepts, such as, the concept of dependent origination, arguing that Buddhism implicitly encompasses environmental issues. In academic circles, the topic of ecology in the context of Buddhism has been developing since the 1960s, and there have been attempts, in the last two decades, to create Buddhist environmental ethics that would respond to specific environmental challenges. In this article, I propose, firstly, to outline the tenets of classical Buddhism that can be interpreted from an ecological point of view. Secondly, to address the critique of the idea of Buddhism’s ecological nature. Thirdly, to examine examples of activities of some contemporary large Buddhist organizations, which may be particularly relevant in the context of modern urban studies and practices. The analysis of environmental initiatives by Buddhist communities in urban settings may offer new approaches to sustainable urban development, ecological transformation of urban spaces, and the formation of environmental consciousness among city dwellers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Vlada A. Volkova, Lomonosov Moscow State University (MSU)

Postgraduate Student, Department of Philosophy, Lomonosov Moscow State University (MSU)

References

Дигха-никая (Собрание длинных поучений) (2020) / Пер. с пали, статьи, коммент. и прил. А.Я. Сыркина; отв. ред. В. П. Андросов. М.: Наука.

Дондуков Б. Ц. (2022) Инициативы Центрального хурула, направленные на улучшение экологической ситуации в Республике Калмыкия // Кунсткамера. 2022. № 4 (18). С. 58–66.

Сутра «Поучения Вималакирти» (2005) / Пер. с тиб. A.M. Донца. Улан-Удэ: Изд-во БНЦ СО РАН.

Buddhadasa B. (1991) Me and Mine: Selected Works of Bhikkhu Buddhadasa / D.K. Swearer (ed). New Delhi: Sri Satguru Pub.

Chadwick D. H. (1995) The Fate of the Elephant. L.: Sierra Club Books, Penguin Books LTD.

Clugston R. (2012) Faith Traditions and Sustainable Development // Exploring Synergies between Faith Values and Education for Sustainable Development. Vol. 4. P. 1–81.

Darlington S. M. (2017) Contemporary Buddhism and Ecology // The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Buddhism / M. Jerryson (ed.). NY: Oxford University Press. P. 487–503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199362387.013.26

Dhammika S. (2015) Nature and the Environment in Early Buddhism. Singapore: Buddha Dhamma Mandala Society, 2015.

Hanh T. N. Dharma Talk: History of Engaged Buddhism. The Mindfulness Bell. Режим доступа: https://www.parallax.org/mindfulnessbell/article/dharma-talk-history-of-engaged-buddhism/ (дата обращения: 15.01.2024).

Harris I. (1991) How Environmentalist Is Buddhism? // Religion. Vol. 21. P. 101–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-721X(91)90058-X

Henning D. H. (2002) A Manual for Buddhism and Deep Ecology. Lismore: Buddha Dharma Education Association.

Ives Ch. (2017) Buddhism // Routledge Handbook of Religion and Ecology / W. Jenkins et al. (eds). NY: Routledge.

King S. B. (2009) Socially Engaged Buddhism (Dimensions of Asian Spirituality). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21313/hawaii/9780824833350.001.0001

Lewis C. C. (2020). Dalai Lama Promotes the Compassion of Vegetarianism for World Animal Day. Buddhistdoor Global. Режим доступа: https://www.buddhistdoor.net/news/dalai-lama-promotes-the-compassion-of-vegetarianism-for-world-animal-day/ (дата обращения: 21.01.2024).

Samuels J. (2016) Buddhist Disaster Relief: Monks, Networks, and the Politics of Religion // Asian Ethnology. Vol. 75. № 1. P. 53–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18874/ae.75.1.03

The Book of the Discipline (Vinaya-Pitaka) (2000) / I. B. Horner (tr.). Pali Text Society. Vol. I (Suttavibhanga).

The Book of the Discipline (Vinaya-Pitaka) (1951) / I. B. Horner (tr.). London: Luzac & Company. Vol. I. (Mahavagga).

The Connected Discourses of the Buddha: A New Translation of the Samyutta Nikaya. (2000) / B. Bodhi (tr.). Boston: Wisdom Publications.

The Group of Discourses (Sutta-Nipata) (2001) / K.R. Norman (tr.). Oxford: Pali Text Society.

The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha: A New Translation of the Majjhima Nikaya. (2009) / B. Bodhi, B. Nanamoli (tr.). Boston: Wisdom Publications.

The Numerical Discourses of the Buddha: A Complete Translation of the Anguttara Nikaya. (2012) / B. Bodhi (tr.). Boston: Wisdom Publications.

Upali Rev. (2013) Pāli Terminologies for ‘Nature’: ‘Harmonious Co-existence’ // Buddhistdoor Global. Режим доступа: https://www.buddhistdoor.net/features/pali-terminologies-for-nature-harmonious-co-existence-in-biodiversity/ (дата обращения: 21.01.2024).

Vinaya Texts (1881) / T. W. Rhys Davids, H. Oldenberg (tr.). Oxford: The Clarendon Press. Part I: The Pâtimokkha The Mahâvagga, I–IV.

Zielke Z. (2023) Contesting Religious Boundaries with Care: Engaged Buddhism and Eco-Activism in the UK // Religions. Vol. 14. № 8. P. 986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14080986

Published
2024-10-27
How to Cite
VolkovaV. A. (2024). Environmental Views and Practices in Early and Modern Buddhism. Urban Studies and Practices, 9(3), 60-66. https://doi.org/10.17323/usp93202460-66