An Anthropology of a Craft Architectural Company: How Ideas Turn into Projects
Abstract
This article explores the genesis and development of architectural projects in a small craft company based in Tyumen, Russia. Drawing on 5.5 years of experience working at the company and data collected through participant observation (October 2023–June 2024), the author analyzes the specifics of the company, its organizational structure, communication practices, and features of interaction with clients. Particular attention to the role of uncertainty and dissonance in the design process is paid. Through two case studies — a project in Bashkortostan and a project in Western Siberia — the author shows how implicit client ideas, the “fluidity” of requirements, and the informal “rules of the game” shape the project development trajectory and influence the final result. The article also considers the impact of digital technologies on architectural practices and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the craft approach. The author concludes that “craft” in architecture should not mean chaos and uncertainty. Implementing clearer organizational structures and communication processes will allow craft companies to maintain their strengths (creative approach, individuality) while enhancing their efficiency and professionalism.
Downloads
References
Добрицына И. А. (2020) Феномен авторского почерка: архитектурное бюро «Атриум» // Теория и история архитектуры. Вып. 1: XI Иконниковские чтения. C. 51–71.
Латур Б. (2013) Наука в действии: следуя за учеными и инженерами внутри общества. Перевод с английского К. Федорова. Санкт-Петербург: Издательство Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге.
Рэнд А. (2011) Источник / Пер. с англ. Д. Костыгина. Москва: Альпина Паблишер.
Сеннет Р. (2018) Мастер / Пер.с англ. Л. Б. Сумм. Москва: Strelka Press.
Стандарт комплексного развития территорий. Книга 5. Руководство по разработке проектов (2019). Москва: STRELKA КБ.
Тарабарина Ю., Кузнецова А., Игнатушко М. (2023) 2023: что говорят архитекторы // Archi.ru. Режим доступа: https://archi.ru/russia/99398/chto-govoryat-arkhitektory (дата обращения: 25.05.2024).
Юкина С., Бикмансурова А. (2020) Архитектор в девелопменте // Archi.ru. Режим доступа: https://archi.ru/russia/88417/arkhitektor-v-developmente (дата обращения: 25.05.2024).
Щербота Е. (2018) Крафтовый бизнес — это всегда эксперимент: руководство к творчеству. Агентство «Диалог». Режим доступа: https://topdialog.ru/2018/04/24/kraftovyj-biznes-eto-vsegda-eksperiment-rukovodstvo-k-tvorchestvu/ (дата обращения: 25.05.2024).
Borch C. (2008) Foam Architecture: Managing Co-isolated Associations // Economy and Society. Vol. 37. № 4. P. 548–571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140802357943
Cuff D. (1992) Architecture: The Story of Practice. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Farías I. (2015) Epistemic Dissonance: Reconfiguring Valuation in Architectural Practice // Moments of Valuation: Exploring Sites of Dissonance / A. Berthoin Antal, M. Hutter, D. Stark (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702504.003.0014
Gottschling P. (2015) To Submit is to Relate: A Study of Architectural Competitions within Networks of Practices. [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Manchester].
Hagen A. L. (2015) “Calling it a Crisis”: Modes of Creative Labour and Magic in an Elite Architect Company // Journal of Business Anthropology. Vol. 4. № 2. P. 201–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22439/jba.v4i2.4891
Houdart S., Minato C. (2009) Kuma Kengo: An Unconventional Monograph. Paris: Donner Lieu.
Jacobs J. M., Merriman P. (2011) Practising Architectures // Social and Cultural Geography. Vol. 12. № 3. P. 211–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2011.565884
Jenkins L. (2002) Geography and Architecture: 11, Rue du Conservatoire and the Permeability of Buildings. Space and Culture. Vol. 5. № 3. P. 222–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331202005003003
Llach D. (2015) Buildings of the Vision: Software and the Imagination of Design. London, UK: Routledge.
Lefebvre P. (2018) I, T.T. Stands. Two Days in the Life of an Object in the Making // Ardeth, № 2. P. 97–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17454/ARDETH02.07
Loukissas Y. (2012) Co-Designers: Cultures of Computer Simulation in Architecture. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203123065
Magnani C. (2018) Note from the Director // Ardeth. № 2. P. 13–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17454/ARDETH02.02
Marchand T. H. J. (2010) Embodied Cognition and Communication: Studies with British Fine Woodworkers // Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. Vol. 16. № S1. P. S100–S120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01612.x
McNeill D. (2005) In Search of the Global Architect: The Case of Norman Foster (And Partners) // International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. Vol. 29. № 3.P. 501–515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00602.x
Morris J. D. (2019) An Ethnography of Three Michigan Architecture Firms: The Effect of Organizational Culture on Workplace Client Engagement. [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan].
Murphy K. M. (2011) Building Stories: The Embodied Narration of What Might Come to Pass // Embodied Interaction, Language and Body in the Material World / C. Goodwin, C. LeBaron, J. Streeck (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rose G., Degen M., Mehuish C. (2014) Networks, Interfaces and Computer-Generated Images: Learning form Digital Visualisations of Urban Redevelopment Projects // Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. Vol. 32. № 3. P. 386–403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d13113p
Schon D. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Sharif A. (2016) Sustainable Architectural Design between Inscription and De-scription: The Case of Masdar City. [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Manchester].
Spier S. (2001) Place, Authorship and the Concrete: Three Conversations with Peter Zumthor. ARQ. Vol. 5. № 1. P. 15–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S135913550100104X
Stenslund A. (2022) Atmosphere in Urban Design. A Workplace Ethnography of an Architecture Practice. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003279846
Yaneva A. (2009) Made by the Office for Metropolitan Architecture: An Ethnography of Design. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.
Yaneva A., Heaphy L. (2012) Urban Controversies and the Making of the Social // Architectural Research Quarterly. Vol. 16. № 1. P. 29–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135512000267
Yarrow T. (2019) Architects: Portraits of a Practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501738494.001.0001
