Nonhuman Animals in Urban Spaces

  • Mark V. Mefed Independent researcher
Keywords: nonhuman animals, agency, political theory, urban space, multi-species city

Abstract

This paper discusses the interaction of nonhuman animals with human animals within urban spaces and the conflicts that arise from these interactions. It argues that these conflicts often emerge due to urban spaces being designed and controlled by humans, with little or no consideration of animals’ needs and agency. It suggests that an anthropocentric perspective dominates urban political theory, which often leads to the exclusion, control, or even eradication of nonhuman animals when they are perceived to be disrupting the human-established order.

The paper advocates for the recognition of nonhuman animals as legitimate urban co-habitants, with the right to influence the construction and the internal organization of urban spaces. This could involve integrating nonhuman animals into the political process, acknowledging their agency, and enabling them to communicate their needs and interests in the infrastructure of the city. This could lead to more harmonious human-animal interactions in urban spaces, transforming the city into a ‘multi-species’ or ‘interspecies’ space.

This paper challenges traditional notions of urban development and governance and calls for a re-evaluation of human-animal relations in the urban context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Mark V. Mefed, Independent researcher

Independent researcher

References

Аристотель (1983) Политика // Сочинения: в 4-х т. Т. 4. М.: Мысль. С. 375–644.

В Оренбурге стая собак загрызла мальчика (2023) // РБК. Режим доступа: https://www.rbc.ru/rbcfreenews/643bffb79a794743ef0274a3 (дата обращения: 30.03.2024).

Гоббс Т. (2021) Левиафан. М.: Рипол-Классик.

Демина Е. (2024) «“Просьба вынести косуль на центральную аллею”: в омских садоводствах обнаружили десятки мертвых животных» // NGS55RU. Режим доступа: https://ngs55.ru/text/animals/2024/02/29/73278281/ (дата обращения: 30.03.2024).

Деррида Ж. (2019) Животное, которым я следовательно являюсь // Социология власти. Т. 31. № 3. С. 220–275.

Крылова К. (2023) Рынок удобных животных. М.: Новое литературное обозрение.

«Лапы вверх: в Бурятии запретили усыплять невостребованных бродячих собак» (2024) // UlanMedia. Режим доступа: https://ulanmedia.ru/news/1687063/ (дата обращения: 04.06.24).

Латур Б. (2018) Политики природы. Как привить наукам демократию. М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс.

Народный Хурал Республики Бурятия (2023) «Принят закон о порядке обращения с животными без владельцев». Режим доступа: https://hural-buryatia.ru/news/detail.php?ID=3774 (дата обращения: 08.05.2024).

«“Ничьи” стрелки: в Баку вновь убивают бродячих собак» (2019) // Sputnik.Азербайджан. Режим доступа: https://az.sputniknews.ru/20190213/otstrel-sobaki-baku-419375175.html (дата обращения: 30.03.2024).

Путин подписал закон о запрете самовыгула животных вне отведенных мест (2023) // РБК. Режим доступа: https://www.rbc.ru/rbcfreenews/64be8a8e9a79477def19b271 (дата обращения: 30.03.2024).

Тарасов А. (2024) «В режиме разжигания ненависти» // Новая газета. Режим доступа: https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2024/02/20/v-rezhime-razzhiganiia-nenavisti (дата обращения: 30.03.2024).

Федеральный закон «Об ответственном обращении с животными и о внесении изменений в отдельные законодательные акты Российской Федерации» от 27.12.2018 N 498-ФЗ (последняя редакция). Режим доступа: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_314646/ (дата обращения: 30.03.2024).

Фомина М. (2024) «В Омской области ввели режим повышенной готовности из-за нашествия косуль» // NGS55RU. Режим доступа: https://ngs55.ru/text/animals/2024/01/05/73092863/ (дата обращения: 30.03.2024).

Acampora R. (2004) Oikos and Domus: On Constructive Co-habitation with Other Creatures // Philosophy and Geography. Vol. 7 No. 2. P. 219–235.

Arcari P., Probyn-Rapsey F., Singer H. (2021) Where Species Don’t Meet: Invisibilized Animals, Urban Nature and City Limits // Nature and Space. Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 940–965.

Baynes-Rock M. (2015) Among the Bone Eaters: Encounters with Hyenas in Harar. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University.

Blattner C.E., Donaldson S., Wilcox R. (2020) Animal Agency in Community: A Political Multispecies Ethnography of Vine Sanctuary // Politics and Animals. Vol. 6. P. 1–22.

Buller H. (2013) Animal Geographies I // Progress in Human Geography. Vol. 38. No. 2. P. 1–11.

Buller H. (2015) Animal Geographies III: Ethics // Progress in Human Geography. Vol. 40 No. 3. P. 1–9.

Boztas S. (2022) Pig Patrol: Amsterdam Airport’s Innovative Approach to Flight Safety // The Guardian. Режим доступа: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/nov/24/pig-patrol-amsterdam-airports-innovative-approach-to-flight-safety (дата обращения: 30.03.2024).

Cochrane A. (2018) Sentientist Politics: A Theory of Global Inter-Species Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cochrane A. (2020) Should Animals Have Political Rights? Cambridge: Polity Press.

Cochrane A., Garner R. O’Sullivan S. (2018) Animal Ethics and the Political // Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. Vol. 21. No. 4. P. 261–277.

Colling S. (2021) Animal Resistance In The Global Capitalist Era. East Lansing, Michigan: Michigan State University Press.

Datta A. (2015) A 100 Smart Cities, A 100 Utopias // Dialogues in Human Geography. Vol. 5. P. 49–53.

Derrida J. (2008) The Animal That Therefore I Am. New York: Fordham University Press.

Donaldson S. (2020) Animal Agora: Animal Citizens And The Democratic Challenge // Social Theory and Practice. Vol. 46. No. 4. P. 709–735.

Donaldson S., Kymlicka W. (2015) Animals in Political Theory // The Oxford Handbook of Animal Studies / L. Kalof. (ed.). P. 34–64.

Donaldson S., Kymlicka W. (2016) Comment: Between Wild and Domesticated: Rethinking Categories and Boundaries in Response to Animal Agency // Animal Ethics in the Age of Humans, The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics / B. Bovenkerk, J. Keulartz (eds.). Vol. 23. P. 225–239.

Donaldson S., Kymlicka W. (2011) Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.

Elder G., Wolch J., Emel J. (1998) Race, Place, and The Bounds of Humanity // Society and Animals. Vol. 6 No. 2. P. 183–202.

Garner R., O'Sullivan S. (2015) Introduction // The Political Turn in Animal Ethics / R. Garner, S. O'Sullivan (eds.). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. P. 1–12.

Gillespie K., Collard R.-C. (2015) Introduction // Critical Animal Geographies: Politics, Intersections and Hierarchies in a Multispecies World. London, New York: Routledge. P. 1–16.

Gillespie K. (2016) Nonhuman Animal Resistance and the Improprieties of Live Property // Animals, Biopolitics, Law Lively Legalities / I. Braverman (ed.). Routledge. P. 117–134.

Gordon J. (2023) Newark Bull Settles in at Animal Sanctuary after Reported Escape from Slaughterhouse // New Jersey Monthly. Режим доступа: https://njmonthly.com/articles/news/newark-bull-animal-sanctuary-reported-escape-slaughterhouse/ (дата обращения: 30.03.2024).

Hobson K. (2007) Political Animals? On Animals as Subjects in an Enlarged Political Geography // Political Geography. Vol. 26. P. 250–267.

Hribal J. (2011) Fear of the Animal Planet. The Hidden History of Animal Resistance. Petrolia, CA: Counterpunch.

Lefebvre H. (2000) The Right To The City // Writings on Cities / E. Kofman, E. Lebas (eds.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers. P. 147–160.

Meijer E. (2023) Deep Listening and Democracy: Political Listening to Fellow Citizens and Other Beings // The Philosopher. Vol. 111 No. 1. Режим доступа: https://www.thephilosopher1923.org/post/deep-listening-and-democracy (дата обращения: 30.03.2024).

Meijer E. (2017) Interspecies Encounters and the Political Turn: From Dialogue to Deliberation // Ethical and Political Approaches to Nonhuman Animal Issues / A. Woodhall, G. Garmendia da Trindade (eds.). London: Palgrave McMillan. P. 201–226.

Meijer E. (2017) When Animals Speak: Toward An Interspecies Democracy. New York: New York University Press.

Meijer E., Bovenkerk B. (2021) Taking Animal Perspectives Into Account in Animal Ethics // Animals in our Midst: The Challenges of Co-existing with Animals in the Anthropocene. B. Bovenkerk, J. Keulartz (eds.). Springer. Vol. 33. P. 49–64.

Metropolitan Transportation Authority (2024). Riding the Subway. Режим доступа: https://new.mta.info/guides/riding-the-subway (дата обращения: 30.03.2024).

Milligan T. (2014) The Political Turn In Animal Rights // Politics and Animals. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 6–15.

Narayanan Y. (2017) Street Dogs at the Intersection of Colonialism and Informality: ‘Subaltern Animism’ as a Posthuman Critique of Indian Cities // Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. Vol. 35 No. 3. P. 475–494.

Narodnyj Hural Respubliki Buryatiya (2023) “Prinyat zakon o poryadke obrashcheniya s zhivotnymi bez vladel'cev”. Available at: https://hural-buryatia.ru/news/detail.php?ID=3774 (accessed 08.05.2024).

Nugent C. (2022) Giant Rodents ‘Invaded’ a Wealthy Gated Community. What Happened Next Is a Lesson for Cities in the Climate Change Era // Time. Режим доступа: https://time.com/6173837/capybaras-argentina-climate-change/ (дата обращения: 30.03.2024).

Palmer C. (2003) Colonization, Urbanization, And Animals // Philosophy and Geography. Vol. 6. P. 47–58.

Parry L.J. (2016) Deliberative Democracy and Animals: Not So Strange Bedfellows // The Political Turn in Animal Ethics / R. Garner, S. O'Sullivan (eds.). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. P. 137–155.

Philo. C, Wilbert C. (2000) Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: An Introduction // Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: New Geographies of Human–Animal Relations / C. Philo, C. Wilbert (eds.). London: Routledge. P. 1–34.

Riding the Subway (2024) // Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Режим доступа: https://new.mta.info/guides/riding-the-subway (дата обращения: 30.03.2024).

Rossello D. (2012) Hobbes and the Wolf-Man: Melancholy and Animality in Modern Sovereignty // New Literary History. Vol. 43. No. 2. P. 255–279.

Shingne M. C. (2020) The More-Than-Human Right to the City: A Multispecies Reevaluation // Journal of Urban Affairs. Vol. 44. No. 2. P. 137–155.

Shingne M. C., Reese L.A. (2022) Animals In The City: Wither The Human-Animal Divide // Journal of Urban Affairs. Vol. 44. No. 2. P. 114–136.

Srinivasan K. (2013) The Biopolitics of Animal Being and Welfare: Dog Control and Care in the UK and India // Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. Vol. 38. P. 106–119.

Weisberg Z. (2011) Animal Repression Speciesism as Pathology // Critical Theory and Animal Liberation / J. Sanbonmatsu (eds.). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. P. 177–193.

Wolch J. R. (2002) Anima Urbis // Progress in Human Geography. Vol. 26 No. 6. P. 721–742.

Wolch J.R. (1998) Zoöpolis // Animal geographies: Place, Politics, and Identity in the Nature-culture Borderlands / J.R. Wolch, J. Emel (eds.). London: Verso. Режим доступа: https://www.versobooks.com/en-gb/blogs/news/3487-zoopolis?_pos=2&_sid=9abfac124&_ss=r (дата обращения: 30.03.2024).

Wolch J. R., West K., Gaines T. E. (1995) Transspecies Urban Theory // Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. Vol. 13. No. 6. P. 735–760.

Wolfson F. (2019) ‘That’s Not a Bag’: Man with Dog Bends New York Subway Rule and Gets Denied // The Guardian. Режим доступа: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/apr/09/new-york-city-subway-dog-rule-bags-denied#:~:text=4%20years%20old-,'That's%20not%20a%20bag'%3A%20man%20with%20dog%20bends%20New,subway%20rule%20and%20gets%20denied&text=In%202016%2C%20the%20Metro%20Transit,would%20not%20annoy%20other%20passengers%E2%80%9D (дата обращения: 30.03.2024).

Published
2024-06-25
How to Cite
MefedM. V. (2024). Nonhuman Animals in Urban Spaces. Urban Studies and Practices, 9(2), 33-43. Retrieved from https://usp.hse.ru/article/view/21851