An Asymmetrical Hybrid: Why is it Difficult to Encounter Nature in the City?

  • Marat R. Nevlyutov Moscow School of Architecture MARCH; S Research Institute of Theory and History of Architecture and Urban Planning (NIITIAG); online magazine PILA
Keywords: hybrid, urbanization of nature, zoonotic diseases, natural disasters, unpredictable encounters, situational knowledge

Abstract

This article examines certain characteristics of hybrids in urban theory. A hybrid describes the mixtures of heterogeneous entities, resulting in a constantly conflicted whole that threatens to be destroyed. Nature, contrasted with the city, acts as a destabilizing element. The inclusion of nature in the city continues to occur through various techniques of control and objective knowledge. This urbanization of nature disrupts the necessary balance of the hybrid, turning it into an asymmetrical network oppressing nature. The article examines such examples of nature’s response as zoonotic diseases and natural disasters, which are described as an ongoing struggle between the city and nature. The possibility of including these phenomena in the city is associated with the articulation of the social and political and with accepting the risk of an “encounter” in the city with the dangerous, variable, and unpredictable. The article outlines some techniques to establish the symmetry of the hybrid and open up the possibility for unpredictable encounters.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Marat R. Nevlyutov, Moscow School of Architecture MARCH; S Research Institute of Theory and History of Architecture and Urban Planning (NIITIAG); online magazine PILA

journalist; teacher, Moscow School of Architecture MARCH; Senior Research Fellow, Scientifiс Research Institute of Theory and History of Architecture and Urban Planning (NIITIAG); Editor-in-Chief, online magazine PILA.

Published
2024-06-25
How to Cite
NevlyutovM. R. (2024). An Asymmetrical Hybrid: Why is it Difficult to Encounter Nature in the City?. Urban Studies and Practices, 9(2), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.17323/usp9220246-14