Gangnam Style: The Role of Local Identity in the Electoral Behavior of Gangnam Residents (Seoul)
Abstract
This article examines the electoral anomaly of Seoul’s Gangnam district created by the identity of its residents. The urban middle class of Seoul, which was formed as a large social group in the 1970s and 1980s, materialized in the Gangnam space. The actions of the authorities, real estate speculation, and the alienation of the district’s residents created the division of Seoul residents into Gangnam people and other people. The district became a symbol of inequality. The homogeneity of the electoral preferences of Gangnam residents is a part of the middle-class homogenization of consumer habits, lifestyle, and values as a manifestation of the neighborhood effect. In the first decades of the district’s existence the local electorate supported the incumbent presidents. After the transition of power from a military administration to the civilian one, one of the two main political groups, usually referred to as “conservative”, inherited from the military group not only power, but also the support of the residents of Gangnam. The main electoral split in Korea manifests itself along regional lines, and the largest parties rely on their electoral bases in the southern regions of the country, while there is no stable predominance of support for any political force in Seoul. The only exception is Gangnam that consistently supports the conservatives. In a country where economic and social differences are barely noticed, identity, regional or local, becomes the main factor in voting. Gangnam is an example that demonstrates the importance of the geographical context when analyzing electoral support for a particular party or candidate in different districts of the city. The factor of place for electoral behavior here is more important than any of the extra-spatial factors that usually affect the results of voting. The concept of electoral cleavages in Gangnam is not applicable. We can conclude that the special electoral culture of this district is practically unaffected by social and economic changes in the city and the country. The internal electoral differentiation of Gangnam is determined by the local context, the identity of local residents, and their belonging to the community.
Downloads
References
Андронова Л. А. (2014) Партийная система Южной Кореи: традиции и современность // Вестник Томского государственного университета. История. Т. 27. No 1. С. 71–75.
Бузин А. Ю. и др. (2020) Возможности математических методов по выявлению электоральных фальсификаций // Electoral Politics. No 2. С. 1–4.
Горкин А. П. (2013) Социально-экономическая география: понятия и термины // Словарь-справочник. Смоленск: Ойкумена.
Цой Ч. Е. (2015) Особенности политических партий Южной Кореи и их участие в государственном управлении // Политическая наука. No 1. С. 73–82.
Agnew J. (1966) Mapping politics: how Context Counts in Electoral Geography // Political Geography. Vol. 15. No. 2. P. 129–146.
Bae Y., Joo Y. M. (2020) The Making of Gangnam: Social Construction and Identity of Urban Place in South Korea // Urban Affairs Review. Vol. 56. No. 3. P. 726–757.
Butler D., Stokes D. (1969) Political Change in Britain. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Chang D., Bae Y. (2012) The Birth of Social Election in South Korea: 2010–2012. Berlin: Fesmedia Asia for Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. P. 1–44.
Cho W., Kwon Y. (2021) The Era of Seoul’s Rapid Growth (1960s–1970s): The Role of Ex-Military Elite Mayors // Cities. Vol. 110. P. 1–16.
Choi E. (2013) Political Issues, Generation Gap, and Voting Behavior in South Korea: The 2010 Seoul Mayoral Election // East Asia. Vol. 30. No. 4. P. 237–254.
Chon S. (1992) Political Economy of Regional Development in Korea // States and Development in the Asian Pacific Rim. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. P. 150–175.
Duverger M. (1959) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen.
Gelézeau V. (2007) Korean Modernism, Modern Korean Cityscapes, and Mass Housing Development: Charting The Rise Of Ap’At’ū tanji Since The 1960s // Korea Yearbook, Brill. P. 165–191.
Ha S. K. (2004) Housing Renewal and Neighborhood Change as a Gentrification Process in Seoul // Cities. Vol. 21. No. 5. P. 381–389.
Hahn Y., Wang L. C., Yang H. S. (2018) Does Greater School Autonomy Make a Difference? Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment in South Korea // Journal of Public Economics. Vol. 161. P. 15–30.
Hix S., Jun H. W. (2009) Party Behaviour in the Parliamentary Arena: The Case of the Korean National Assembly // Party politics. Vol. 15. No. 6. P. 667–694.
Hochul S. (2003) Regional Cleavage in Korean Politics and Elections // Korea Journal. Vol. 43. No. 2. P. 32–54.
Huckfeldt R. et al. (1995) Political Environments, Cohesive Social Groups, and the Communication of Public Opinion // American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 39. No. 4. P. 1025–1054.
Johnston R. J. (1974) Local Effects in Voting at a Local Election // Annals of the Association of American Geographers. Vol. 64. No. 3. P. 418–429.
Jung D. H. (2004) Korean Chaebol in Transition // China Report. Vol. 40. No. 3. Р. 299–303.
Kang H. S. (2020) Exporting Urban Korea? Reconsidering the Korean Urban Development Experience. Oxon; New York: Routledge.
Kim B. K. (1996) Parties, Elections, and the Party System // International Conference at Imin Institute, Korea University.
Kim H. J. (2015) Elite Education and Hierarchy Reproduction in Seoul, South Korea: Grounded Theory Approach on University Entrance Preparatory Practice of Gangnam-elites.
Kim I. (2021) Spatial Distribution of Neighborhood-Level Housing Prices and Its Association with All-Cause Mortality in Seoul, Korea (2013–2018): A Spatial Panel Data Analysis // SSM-Population Health. Vol. 16. P. 19–27.
Kim J. I. (2014) Gangnam Style Again? The Origins of South Korean Urban Modernity // ARCC Conference Repository. P. 164–170.
Kim J. I. (2015) The Birth of Urban Modernity in Gangnam, Seoul // ARQ: Architectural Research Quarterly. Vol. 19. No. 4. P. 369–379.
Kim K. H., You S. D. (2021) The Global Financial Crisis and Transition out of Homeownership in Korea // Journal of Housing Economics. Vol. 54. P. 1–14.
Korea Real Estate Agency (KREA). Режим доступа: [http://www.kab.co.kr](http://www.kab.co.kr) (дата обращения: 02.08.2021).
Korean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS). Режим доступа: [http://kosis.kr/eng/](http://kosis.kr/eng/) (дата обращения: 20.02.2021).
Kwon K. (2004) Regionalism in South Korea: Its Origins and Role in Her Democratization // Politics & Society. Vol. 32. No. 4. P. 545–574.
Kwon K. (2021) Polycentricity and the Role of Government-Led Development: Employment Decentralization and Concentration in the Seoul Metropolitan Area, 2000–2015 // Cities. Vol. 111. P. 103–107.
Lee D., Lee H. (2011) Cognitive Scale of Gangnam and the Rationale Behind Making Boundaries // Seoul Studies. Vol. 42. P. 123–171.
Lee D. O., Brunn S. D. (1996) Politics and Regions in Korea: An Analysis of the Recent Presidential Election // Political Geography. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 99–119.
Lee M. W. (2016) «Gangnam Style» English Ideologies: Neoliberalism, Class and the Parents of Early Study-Abroad Students // International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Vol. 19. No. 1. P. 35–50.
Lee Y., You J. (2019) Is Class Voting Emergent in Korea? // Journal of East Asian Studies. Vol. 19. No. 2. P. 197–213.
Lee Y. S. (2015) School Districting and the Origins of Residential Land Price Inequality // Journal of Housing Economics. Vol. 28. P. 1–17.
Lett D. P. (1998) In Pursuit of Status: The Making of South Korea’s «New» Urban Middle Class. Harvard Univ. Asia Center.
Lijphart A. (1977) Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. Yale University Press.
Lipset S. M., Rokkan S. (1967) Party System and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. Free Press, New York.
Miller W. L. (1977) Electoral Dynamics in Britain since 1918. Springer.
Morriss P. (1996) Electoral Politics in South Korea // Electoral Studies. Vol. 15. No. 4. P. 550–562.
Park B. G. (2003) Territorialized Party Politics and the Politics of Local Economic Development: State-Led Industrialization and Political Regionalism in South Korea // Political Geography. Vol. 22. No. 8. P. 811–839.
Park J. (2019) Neoliberalism Meets «Gangnam Style»: Vernacular Private Sector and Large Urban Developments in Seoul // Urban Planning. Vol. 4. No. 4. P. 62–72.
Shin H. B. (2009) Property-Based Redevelopment and Gentrification: The Case of Seoul, South Korea // Geoforum. Vol. 40. No. 5. P. 906–917.
Shin H. B., Kim S. H. (2016) The Developmental State, Speculative Urbanisation and the Politics of Displacement in Gentrifying Seoul // Urban Studies. Vol. 53. No. 3. P. 540–559.
Yang M. (2018) The Rise of «Gangnam style»: Manufacturing the Urban Middle Class in Seoul, 1976–1996 // Urban Studies. Vol. 55. No. 15. P. 3404–3420.
