Adolescent Mobility around the City: Motives, Opportunities, and Limitations
Abstract
This paper studies adolescent use of the urban space in Russia. A large number of studies have shown the relationship between the development of personal autonomy, psychological well-being, and the ability to master the physical environment. The paper describes the positive effects of independent mobility in childhood and adolescence, and the factors that contribute to reducing and limiting adolescents’ independent mobility. To update ideas about the subjective meanings and values of independent movement in adolescence, a pilot study was conducted of interviews with 13 respondents aged 10–15. The interviews discussed the main motivations for going outside; restrictions that prevent adolescents from using the urban space, including situations that cause concern, parental control and sanctions that occur after violating agreements with parents; and the resources that promote successful independent movement. The respondents consider independent movement to be a valuable experience and a necessary condition for their own personal development, and emphasize the need for parental control to help them stay safe. The pilot study shows that for the timely and safe development of an adolescent’s autonomy, a balance is needed between the requirements and expectations of the family and the adolescents’ willingness to take responsibility and learn new skills. Despite the limited and homogeneous sample of respondents, in which there are no adolescents who lack parental attention or who have premature or excessive access to independent mobility, the study and the results obtained are important for understanding how adolescents use the urban space and what potential for personal development it can have. A proposal is suggested to extend the study, investigating the cross-town movements of adolescents with the participation of respondents with diverse cultural and social backgrounds, and examine the contribution of this experience to personal autonomy and self-determination in adolescents.
Downloads
References
Бочавер А. А., Корзун А. Н., Поливанова К. Н. (2017) Уличный досуг детей и подростков // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. Т. 14. No 3. С. 470–490.
Выготский Л. С. (1934) Основы педологии. М.: Изд-во 2-го Моск. мед. ин-та. Стеногр. курс лекций. 211 с.
Джейкобс Дж. (2011) Смерть и жизнь больших американских городов. М.: Новое издательство.
Куприяшкина Е. А. (2018) Особенности детской независимой мобильности в городах Приморского края // Вестник Нижегородского ун-та им. Н. И. Лобачевского. Социальные науки. Т. 2. No 50. С. 115–123.
Поскребышева Н. Н., Карабанова О. А. (2014) Исследование личностной автономии подростка в контексте социальной ситуации развития // Национальный психологический журнал. Т. 4. No 16. С. 34–41.
Ракитина Н. Э., Филипова А. Г. (2017) Городская «доброжелательность» к детям: от неравенства к соучаствующему проектированию городской среды (на материалах городов юга Дальнего Востока). Владивосток: Изд-во Дальневосточного федерального ун-та. 188 с.
Сивак Е. В., Глазков К. П. (2017) Жизнь вне класса: повседневная мобильность школьников // Вопросы образования. No 2. С. 113–133.
Свободное время московских подростков (2016). М.: МИСКП. Режим доступа: [http://miscp.ru/assets/docs/teens.pdf](http://miscp.ru/assets/docs/teens.pdf) (дата обращения: 15.09.2020).
Фельдштейн Д. И. (2013) Мир Детства в современном мире (проблемы и задачи исследования). М.: МПСУ. 335 с.
Badland H., Oliver M. (2012) Making the Case and Understanding How the Physical and Social Environments Impact on the Behaviour // Urbanization and the Global Environment / Turunen, E., Koskinen, A. (eds.). New York: NOVA Publishers. P. 51–79.
Boyd D. (2014) It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
Davis A., Jones L. (1996) Children in the Urban Environment: An Issue for the New Public Health Agenda // Health Place. Vol. 2. P. 107–113.
Finkelhor D., Ormrod R. (2000) Characteristics of Crimes Against Juveniles // Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Режим доступа: [https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/179034.pdf](https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/179034.pdf) (дата обращения: 15.09.2020).
Foster S., Villanueva K., Wood L., Christian H., Giles-Corti B. (2014) The Impact of Parents’ Fear of Strangers and Perceptions of Informal Social Control on Children’s Independent Mobility // Health & Place. Vol. 26. P. 60–68.
Gaster S. (1991) Urban Children’s Access to Their Neighbourhood. Changes over Three Generations // Environment and Behavior. Vol. 23. P. 70–85.
Guthold R., Stevens G., Riley L., Bull F. (2020) Global Trends in Insufficient Physical Activity Among Adolescents: A Pooled Analysis of 298 Population-Based Surveys with 16 Million Participants // The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. Vol. 4. No. 1. P. 23–35.
Herman J. F. (1987) Children’s Spatial Knowledge of Their Neighborhood Environment // Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 1–15.
Hillman M., Adams J., Whitelegg J. (1990) One False Move: A Study of Children’s Independent Mobility. London: Policy Studies Institute.
Johansson M. (2006) Environment and Parental Factors as Determinants of Mode for Children’s Leisure Travel // Journal of Environmental Psychology. Vol. 26. P. 156–169.
Joshi M. S., Maclean M., Morys-Carter W. (1999) Children’s Journey to School: Spatial Skills, Knowledge and Perception of the Environment // British Journal of Developmental Psychology. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 125–139.
Kyttä M. (2004) The Extent of Children’s Independent Mobility and the Number of Actualized Affordances as Criteria for Child-Friendly Environments // Journal of Environmental Psychology. Vol. 24. No. 2. P. 179–198.
Lareau A. (2002) Invisible Inequality: Social Class and Childrearing in Black Families and White Families // American Sociological Review. Vol. 67. P. 747–776.
Lynch K. (1977) Growing Up in Cities. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Malone K. A. (2007) The Bubble-Wrap Generation: Children Growing up in Walled Gardens // Environmental Education Research. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 513–527.
Matthews H. (1992) Making Sense of Place: Children’s Understanding of Large-Scale Environments. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
O’Brien M. (2000) Children’s Independent Spatial Mobility in the Urban Public Realm // Childhood. Vol. 7. No. 3. P. 257–277.
Piccininni C., Michaelson V., Janssen I., Pickett W. (2018) Outdoor Play and Nature Connectedness as Potential Correlates of Internalized Mental Health Symptoms among Canadian Adolescents // Preventive Medicine. Vol. 112. P. 168–175.
Prezza M. (2007) Current Fear of Crime, Sense of Community, and Loneliness in Italian Adolescents: The Role of Autonomous Mobility and Play During Childhood // Journal of Community Psychology. Vol. 35. No. 2. P. 151–170.
Rissotto A., Tonucci F. (2002) Freedom of Movement and Environmental Knowledge in Elementary School Children // Journal of Environmental Psychology. Vol. 22. No. 1–2. P. 65–77.
Shaw B., Fagan-Watson B., Frauendienst B., Redecker A., Jones T., Hillman M. (2013) Children’s Independent Mobility: A Comparative Study in England and Germany (1971–2010). London: Policy Studies Institute.
Shutt J. E., Miller J. M., Schreck C. J., Brown N. K. (2004) Reconsidering the Leading Myths of Stranger Child Abduction // The Justice Professional. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 127–134.
Spilsbury J. C. (2005) We Don’t Really Get to Go out in the Front Yard – Children’s Home Range and Neighborhood Violence // Children’s Geographies. Vol. 3. No. 1. P. 79–99.
Tranter P., Whitelegg J. (1994) Children’s Travel Behaviours in Canberra: Car-Dependent Lifestyles in A Low-Density City // Journal of Transport Geography. Vol. 2. No. 4. P. 265–27.
