“The Border Across the Street”: The Permeability of Borders Between Divided Cities (In Moldova and Transnistria)
Abstract
This study pursues two main o tives—to identify the optimal method for estimating the permeability of a border between divided cities; and to assess the connectivity of three settlement areas on the MoldovanTransnistria border (Bender — Varnița, Dubossary — Corjova — Cocieri, and Rybnitsa Rezina). Using the dichotomy of “debordering” and “rebordering”, an attempt was made to identify whether the Moldovan-Transnistrian border is a barrier or is permeable. The article is based on expert interviews and field observations conducted on both sides of the border in 2014 and 2019. In autumn 2020, focus groups were held in Bender and Dubossary to understand the dynamics of cross-border flows, especially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The connectivity of the divided settlements was assessed according to 17 criteria, grouped into five categories: barriers on the line of demarcation; transport connectivity; socio-economic links; currency exchange; and telecommunications. The methodology can be applied to the study of the connectivity of other divided cities.
Our research exposed a paradoxical situation. At the official level, the de facto border between Moldova and Transnistria remains a relic of conflict and appears to be closed to bilateral links. However, in divided cities, many restrictions do not apply. Local residents find ways to circumvent the bans, indicating that the border is in fact permeable. The greatest intensity of cross-border contacts was revealed in Bender, the least in Rybnitsa. COVID-19 has significantly complicated the daily lives of the locals, particularly after Transnistrian authorities closed the borders within the cities. The securitization of borders has significantly changed the habits of the local population and determined the most significant areas of cross-border practices. However, people have adapted to the situation, and the divided cities remain linked by various socio-economic ties. Despite the border closure and severe bilateral restrictions, the populations of both banks of the Dniester have not stopped interacting.
Downloads
References
Бражалович Ф. Л., Ключников М. И., Колосов В. А., Павлюк С. Г., Попов Ф. А., Туров Н. Л. (2017) Жизнь поверх границ конфликта: социально-экономические аспекты трансграничного взаимодействия внутри разделенных городов (на примере Бендер и Дубоссар) // Известия РАН. Серия географическая. No 3. С. 45–57.
Вендина О. И., Гриценко А. А. (2017) Культурный ландшафт пограничья и борьба за символические ресурсы утверждения суверенитета // В фокусе наследия. Сборник статей, посвященный 80-летию Ю. А. Веденина и 25-летию создания Российского научно-исследовательского института культурного и природного наследия имени Д. С. Лихачева / М. Е. Кулешова (ред.). М.: Институт географии РАН. С. 398–417.
Герцен А. А. (2010) Административно-территориальное деление Молдавии в контексте историко-географических исследований Карпато-Днестровья // Известия РАН. Серия географическая. No 2. С. 25–39.
Заяц Д. В., Колосов В. А. (2001) Молдова и Приднестровье: национальное строительство, территориальные идентичности, перспективы разрешения конфликта // Вестник Евразии. No 1. С. 88–122.
Колосов В. А. (2016) Трансграничная регионализация и фронтальерские миграции: европейский опыт для России? // Региональные исследования. No 3. С. 83–93.
Попов Ф. А. (2017) Размышления о целях и методах изучения ментального влияния городов // Городские исследования и практики. No 2. С. 13–32.
Allegra M., Casaglia A., Rokem J. (2012) The Political Geographies of Urban Polarization: A Critical Review of Research on Divided Cities // Geography Compass. Vol. 6. No. 9. P. 560–574.
Atun R., Doratli N. (2009) Walls in Cities: A Conceptual Approach to the Walls of Nicosia // Geopolitics. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 108–134.
Basboga K. (2020) The Role of Open Borders and Cross-Border Cooperation in Regional Growth across Europe // Regional Studies, Regional Science. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 532–549.
Blakkisrud H., Kolstø P. (2011) From Secessionist Conflict toward a Functioning State: Processes of State- and Nation-Building in Transnistria // Post-Soviet Affairs. Vol. 27. No. 2. P. 178–210.
Boehmer C., Peña S. (2012) The Determinants of Open and Closed Borders // Journal of Borderlands Studies. Vol. 27. No. 3. P. 273–285.
Böhm H. (2022) Challenges of Pandemic-Related Border Closures for Everyday Lives of Poles and Czechs in the Divided Town of Cieszyn/Český Těšín: Integrated Functional Space or Reemergence of Animosities? // Nationalities Papers. Vol. 50. No. 1. P. 130–144.
Böhm H., Kurowska-Pysz J. (2019) Can Cross-Border Healthcare Be Sustainable? An Example from the Czech-Austrian Borderland // Sustainability. Vol. 11. No. 24. P. 1–14.
Brites W. (2018) Twin cities? Posadas, Argentina and Encarnación, Paraguay from a Socio-urban Perspective // Estudios Fronterizos. Vol. 19, e020.
Buursink J. (2001) The Binational Reality of Border-Crossing Cities // GeoJournal. Vol. 54. No. 1. P. 7–19.
Dębicki M., Tamáska M. (2014) Divided Twin Towns at River Borders in the Visegrad Countries and Germany // Socio.hu. Vol. 24. No. 2. P. 1–20.
Gentile M. (2019) Geopolitical Fault-Line Cities in the World of Divided Cities // Political Geography. Vol. 71. P. 126–138.
Gutierrez M., Sanchez-Atondo A., Garсia L., Mungaray-Moctezuma A., Calderon J. (2021) Understanding Cross-Border Mobility in Medium-Small Mexico-U. S. Binational Regions. Mexicali-Imperial Valley Case Study // Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Vol. 9, March. Режим доступа: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198221000312](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198221000312) (дата обращения: 22.05.2022).
Hoetjes B. (2009) Trends and Issues in Municipal Twinnings from the Netherlands // Habitat International. Vol. 33. No. 2. P. 157–164.
Joenniemi P., Sergunin A. (2011) When Two Aspire to Become One: City-Twinning in Northern Europe // Journal of Borderlands Studies. Vol. 26. No. 2. P. 231–242.
Kolosov V., Zotova M. (2021) “De-Facto Borders” as a Mirror of Sovereignty: The Case of the Post-Soviet Non-Recognized States // Historical Social Research. Vol. 46. No. 3. P. 178–207.
Kolstø P., Edemsky A., Kalashnikova N. (1993) The Dniester Conflict: Between Irredentism and Separatism // Europe-Asia Studies. Vol. 45. No. 6. P. 973–1000.
Kotek J. (1999) Divided cities in the European cultural context // Progress in Planning. Vol. 52. No. 3. P. 227–237.
OpenStreetMap.org. Режим доступа: [https://www.openstreetmap.org](https://www.openstreetmap.org) (дата обращения: 22.05.2022).
Prokkola E.-K. (2019) Border-regional Resilience in EU Internal and External Border Areas in Finland // European Planning Studies. Vol. 27. No. 8. P. 1587–1606.
Schultz H. (2005) Stadt—Grenze—Fluss. Europäische Doppelstädte. Berlin: Spitz.
Schwab V. (2021) Towards More Resilient Border Twin Cities? The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Induced (Im)Mobility Shock on Two European Border Twin Cities (Master’s thesis). Stockholm. Режим доступа: [https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1562188/FULLTEXT01.pdf](https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1562188/FULLTEXT01.pdf) (дата обращения: 22.05.2022).
Stryjakiewicz T., Tölle A. (2009) Cross-border Cooperation and Governance: The Case of the Twin Cities of Frankfurt-upon-Oder and Słubice // Terra Spectra. Vol. XX. No. 1. P. 19–25.
Viswanathan N. K. et al. (2005) An Analysis of Commonality in the Twin Metropolitan Areas of San Diego, California, and Tijuana, Mexico // Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. Vol. 39. No. 1. P. 57–79.
Zenderowski R. (2021) Politics of Memory in Cities Divided by State Borders: Theoretical and Methodological Framework of Research // Historia i Polityka. Vol. 45. No. 38. P. 127–141.
