Социальные эффекты цифровых городских политик: московский опыт в контексте мирового
Аннотация
В данной обзорной статье рассматривается проблематика приватности как ключевой проблемы, возникающей при столкновении городских политик в сфере цифровых технологий с жизненным миром горожан. Авторы описывают различные аффекты приватности, характерные для цифрового поведения людей и их отношения к новым технологиям парадокс приватности, цифровой эскапизм, апатия, цинизм в отношении приватности. Затем проводится сравнительный анализ международного опыта и российского (прежде всего на примере г. Москвы) в использовании таких актуальных технологий, как QR-коды, распознавание лиц с помощью видеокамер и цифровые партисипативные платформы (подобные «Активному гражданину»). Авторы делают вывод о том, что противоречие между технократическими цифровыми практиками управления городской средой, являющимися по своей сути организованными вертикально, и горизонтальными практиками самоорганизации горожан в настоящий момент сведено до минимума.
Скачивания
Литература
Кунцман A., Богданова Е.О., Пономарева З.Я., Щетвина А.А. (2018) Отказ и ограничение использования интернета в среде российских IT-специалистов // Социология власти. № 3. С. 144–164.
ВЦИОН (2021) Отношение россиян к мерам по борьбе с коронавирусом. Режим доступа: https://wci-on.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/otnoshenie-rossijan-k-meram-po-borbe-s-koro-naviruson (дата обращения 17.04.2023).
ВЦИОН (2022) Искусственный интеллект: угроза или светлое будущее? Режим доступа: https://wci-on.ru/analytical-reviews/analitich-eskii-obzor/iskusstvennyi-intellekt-ugro-za-ili-svetlo-budushchee (дата обращения 17.04.2023).
Almada S.J., Zonderman A.B., Shekelle R.B. et al. (1991) Neuroticism and Cynicism and Risk of Death in Middle-Aged Men//Psychosomatic Medicine. No. 53. P. 166–175.
Asghar H., Farokhi F., Kaafar D., Rubinstein B. (2021) On the Privacy of Tracetogether, the Singaporean COVID-19 Contact Tracing Mobile App, and Recommendations for Australia. Режим доступа: https://eng.unimelb.edu.au/ingenu/m/technology-and-society/on-the-privacy-of-tracetogether,-the-singaporean-co-vid-19-contact-tracing-mobile-app,-and-recommendations-for-australia (дата обращения: 17.04.2023).
Ashby M.P.L. (2017) The Value of CCTV Surveillance Cameras as an Investigative Tool: An Empirical Analysis//European Journal of Criminology Policy Research. No. 23. P. 441–459.
Bennett T., Gelsthorpe L. (1996) Public Attitudes Toward CCTV (Closed Circuit Television) in Public Places//Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention. Vol. 5 (1). P. 72–90.
Bronberg D.E., Charbonneau E., Smith A. (2020) Public Support for Facial Recognition via Police Body-Worn Cameras: Findings from a List Experiment//Government Information Quarterly. Vol. 37 (1). P. 1–8.
Choi H., Park J., Jung Y. (2018) The Role of Privacy Fatigue in Online Privacy Behaviour//Computers in Human Behavior. No. 81. P. 42–51.
Dean J.W., Brandes P., Dharmaakar R. (1998) Organizational Cynicism//Academy of Management Review. No. 23. P. 341–352.
Denck L.V., Cable J. (2021) The Advent of Surveillance Realism//International Journal of Communication. No. 11. P. 762–781.
Denso Wave (2021) On Code Development Story vol. 1. Режим доступа: https://www.denso-wave.com/en/technology/voll.html (дата обращения: 17.04.2023).
Ellis D. (2020) Techno-Securitisation of Everyday Life and Cultures of Surveillance-Apathels//Science as Culture. Vol. 29 (1). P. 11–29.
EU SCIS (2022) EU Smart Cities Information System: Projects and Sites Overview. Режим доступа: https://smart-cities-marketplace.europa.eu/projects-and-sites (дата обращения: 17.04.2023).
Falco E., Kleidmans R. (2018) Digital Participatory Platforms for Co-Production in Urban Development: A Systematic Review//International Journal of E-Planning Research. Vol. 7 (3). P. 1–27.
Farina C.R., Epstein D., Heidt J., Newhart N.J. (2014) Designing an Online Civic Engagement Platform: Balancing ‘More’ vs. ‘Better’ Participation in Complex Public Policymaking//International Journal of E-Politics. Vol. 5 (1). P. 16–40.
Feeney M.K., Brown A. (2017) Are Small Cities Online? Content, Ranking, and Variation of US Municipal Websites//Government Information Quarterly. Vol. 34 (1). P. 62–74.
Flaherty D.H. (1989) Protecting Privacy in Surveillance Societies. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
French M., Monahan T. (2020) Dis-ease Surveillance: How Night Surveillance Studies Address COVID-19?//Surveillance and Society. No. 18. P. 1–11.
Floridi L. (2014) Open Data, Data Protection, and Group Privacy//Philosophy & Technology. No. 27. P. 1–3.
Floridi L. (2016) On Human Dignity as a Foundation for the Right to Privacy//Philosophy & Technology. No. 29. P. 307–312.
Gavison R. (1980) Privacy and the Limits of the Law//Vale Law Journal. Vol. 89 (4). P. 421–471.
Haverl A., Antitirolio A.-V. (2023) Urban Platforms as a Mode of Governance//International Review of Administrative Sciences. Vol. 89 (1). P. 3–20.
Hindman M. (2008) The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hoffmann C.P., Lutz C., Ranzini G. (2016) Privacy Cynicism: A New Approach to the Privacy Paradox // Journal of Psychosocial Research. Vol. 10 (4). DOI: 10.5817/CP2016-4-7.
Langworthy R.H. (1987) Police Cynicism: What We Know From the Niederhoffer Scale // Journal of Criminal Justice. Vol. 15 (1). P. 17–35.
Löfgren K., Webster C.W. R. (2020) The Value of Big Data in Government: The Case of 'Smart Cities.' // Big Data & Society. Vol. 7 (1). DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720927775.
Lutz C., Hoffmann C.P., Ranzini G. (2020) Data Capitalism and the User: An Exploration of Privacy Cynicism in Germany // New Media & Society. Vol. 22 (7). P. 1168–1187.
Mann S. (2005) Souvevillance and Cyberglogs. A 30-year Empirical Voyage Through Ethical, Legal and Policy Issues // Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. Vol. 14 (6). P. 625–646.
McStay A. (2020) Emotional AI, Soft Biometrics and the Surveillance of Emotional Life: An Unusual Consensus on Privacy // Big Data & Society. No. 7. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720904386.
Mols A., Janssen S. (2017) Not Interesting Enough to be Followed by the MSA // Digital Journalism. No. 5:3. P. 277–298.
Naker S., Greenbaum D. (2017) Now You See Me: How You Still Do: Facial Recognition Technology and the Growing Lack of Privacy // Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law. Vol. 23 (1). P. 88–122.
Nam-Jin L., Shah Oh V., McLeod J.N. (2013) Processes of Political Socialization: A Communication Mediation Approach to Youth Civic Engagement // Communication Research. Vol. 40 (5). P. 669–97.
Nguyen D. (2022) Convenient efficiency: A media genealogy of QR codes // New Media & Society. 0(0) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221141886.
Norberg P.A., Horne D.R., Horne D.A. (2007) The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions Versus Behaviors // Journal of Consumer Affairs. Vol. 41 (1). P. 100–126.
Pew Research Center (2019) More Than Half of U.S. Adults Trust Law Enforcement to Use Facial Recognition Responsibility. Режим доступа: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/09/05/more-than-half-of-u-s-adults-trust-law-enforcement-to-use-facial-recognition-responsibly/ (дата обращения: 17.04.2023).
Peter C., Meyer C. (2022) Organizing for the Smart African City: Leveraging the Urban Commons for Exerting the Right to the City // Organization Studies. 0 (0) DOI: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0170840621289669.
Poplin A., Pereira G.C., Rocha M.C.F. (2013) The Participatory Cube: A Framework for Analysis of Online Participation Platforms. / In: Geertman, S., Toppen, F., Stillwell, J. (eds) // Planning Support Systems for Sustainable Urban Development. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. vol 195. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Przinsack B. (2019) Logged out: Ownership, Exclusion and Public Value in the Digital Data and Information Commons // Big Data & Society. Vol. 6 (1). DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719829773.
O'Reilly T. (2010) Government as a Platform. In: Lathrop Daniel, Ruma Laurel (Eds.), Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice (P. 11–39). Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.
Segijn C.M., van Odijen I. (2020) Perceptions of Techniques Used to Personalize Messages Across Media in Real Time // Cyberpsychology Behaviour and Social Networking. Vol. 23 (5). P. 329–337.
Shachar A., Mahmood A. (2021) The Body as the Border // Historical Social Research Histories and Socialists. Vol. 46 (3). P. 124–150.
Sheldon B. (2011) Camera Surveillance Within the UK: Enhancing Public Safety or a Social Threat? // International Review of Law, Computers & Technology. No. 25. P. 193–203.
Solove Daniel J., Privacy Self-Management and the Consent Dilemma (November 4, 2012). 126 Harvard Law Review 1880 (2013). GNU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012–141. GNU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2012–141. Режим доступа:
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2170188.
Suisit T., Wagee L., Phuong J., Sweeting D. (2017) The Labour of Communicating Publics: Participatory Platforms, Socio-Technical Intermediaries and Pluralistic Expertise // Communication and the Public. No. 2. P. 210–225.
Taewoo Nam (2019) What Determines the Acceptance of Government Surveillance? Examining the Influence of Information Privacy Correlates // The Social Science Journal. No. 56:4. P. 530–544.
Tai Z., Yu X., He B. (2021) Locked Down Through Virtual Disconnect: Navigating Life by Staying on/Off the Health QR Code During COVID-19 in China // Convergence. Vol. 27 (6). P. 1648–1662.
Taylor L., Floridi L., van der Sloot B. (2016) Group Privacy: New Challenges of Data Technologies. Berlin: Springer.
Westin A.F. (1967) Privacy and Freedom. New York: Athenaum.
Mu J., Wang J., Nicholas S. et al. (2020) Application of Big Data Technology for COVID-19 Prevention and Control in China: Lessons and Recommendations // Journal of Medical Internet Research. Vol. 22 (10): e21980.
Yang F., Heemsbergen L., Fortyce R. (2021) Comparative Analysis of China's Health Code, Australia's COVERSafe and New Zealand's COVID Tracer Surveillance Apps: A New Corona of Public Health Governments. Vol. 178 (1). P. 182–197.
