Does E-Participation help to improve local public goods provision: road mending in Russia
Abstract
What is the impact of e-participation on quality of public administration? The literature on public participation suggests two basic perspectives. Some researchers and practitioners are skeptical about public participation, indicating that democratic and bureaucratic processes inherently conflict with each other. They insist that when individuals are brought into policy making and implementation there is going to be a waste of funds.
On the other hand, there are signs that public participation can bring significant benefits for elected and appointed officials. It may, for example, alleviate the asymmetry of information and com pensate for the lack of expertise in the bureaucracy, improving the quality of policy outcomes. In the e-participation literature, re searchers pay little to no atten tion to improvements of governance quality and mostly focus on trust and engagement issues.
In Russia, the number of e-participation platforms has been growing consistently. The most popular mode of interaction is e-complaints, where residents can inform governments about issues such as road quality, trash collection, and lighting. In this paper we test theoretical propositions through analyzing e-complaint portals in Russia. We employ quasi-experimental strategy by assessing how e-complaints portals affected local road quality. We find consistent evidence that they help the upkeep of roads or improve their condition. Furthermore, the effect is cumulative and increases with each year of exposure to the platforms.
Downloads
References
Чугунова А.В. (2016) Электронное участие как канал обратной связи власти и граждан: Проблемы институционализации // Азимут научных исследований: экономика и управление. Т. 4 (17). С. 453–459.
Чугунова А.В., Филатова О.Г. (ред.) (2020) Электронное участие // Концептуализация и практика реализации в России. СПб.: Алетейз.
Кабанов Ю.А., Панфилов Г.О., Чугунова А.В. (2021) Мониторинг электронного участия в регионах России: результаты исследований 2020-2021 гг. // Государство и граждане в электронной среде. № 4. С. 65–75.
Akadide A., Diamond A., Haimweller J. (2010) Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program // Journal of the American Statistical Association. Vol. 105 (490). P. 493–505. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746.
Anseli C.K. (2016) Collaborative Governance as Creative Problem-Solving // Enhancing Public Innovation by Transforming Public Governance / Turing, J., Triantafillou, P. (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, P. 35–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316105337.002.
Arnstein S.R. (1969) A Ladder of Citizen Participation // Journal of the American Institute of Planners. Vol. 35 (4). P. 216–224. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225.
Bayer P., Aklin M. (2020). The European Union Emissions Trading System reduced CO2 emissions despite low prices // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 117 (16). P. 8804–8812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918128117.
Beierle T.C. (1999) Using Social Goals to Evaluate Public Participation in Environmental Decisions // Review of Policy Research. Vol. 16 (3–4). P. 75–103. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1999.tb08079.x.
Beierle T.C., Cayford J. (2002) Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions. Resources for the Future. Routledge.
Belanger F., Carter L. (2008) Trust and Risk in E-Government Adoption // The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. Vol. 17 (2). P. 165–176. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002.
Boward T., Löffner E. (2003) Evaluating the Quality of Public Governance: Indicators, Models and Methodologies // International Review of Administrative Sciences. Vol. 69. No. 3. P. 313–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852303693002
Boyer-Wright K.H., Kottemann J.E. (2009) An Empirical Assessment of Common Fundamentals in National E-Beadiness Frameworks // Journal of global information technology management: JGITM. Vol. 12 (3). P. 55–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198.2085.2099.10856497.
Chan F.T. S., Yee-Loong Chong A. (2013) Analysis of the Determinants of Consumers’ N-Commerce Usage Activities // Online Information Review. Vol. 37 (3). P. 443–461. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-OI-2012-0012.
Coleman R., Lieber P., Mendelson A.L., Kurplus D.D. (2008) Public Life and The Internet: If You Build a Better Website, Will Citizens Become Engaged?//New Media, Society, Vol. 10 (2). P. 179-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807966474.
Dahl R. (1992) The Problem of Civic Competence//Journal of Democracy. Vol. 3 (4). P. 45-59.
van Dooren W., Bouckaert G., Halligan J. (2015) Performance Management in the Public Sector (Second edition). Routledge.
Ebdon C., Franklin A.L. (2006) Citizen Participation in Budgeting Theory//Public Administration Review. Vol. 66 (3). P. 437-447. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00600.x.
Erkkiia T., Piironen O. (2018) Field Structuration and Fragmentation of Global Rankings/EtkKiIa, T., Piironen, O. (Eds.)//Ranking and Global Knowledge Governance: Higher Education, Innovation and Competitiveness. Springer International Publishing. P. 123-175. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68941-8_5.
Fung A. (2005) Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy. Princeton University Press.
Gertler P.J., Gonzalez-Navarro M., Graener T., Rothenberg A.D. (2016) Road Quality, Local Economic Activity, and Welfare: Evidence from Indonesia's Highways. UC Berkeley: Center for Effective Global Action. Pewww.acrny.nl: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0vs9p5mb
Gorgulu N., Sharafutdinova G., Steinboks J. (2020) Political Dividends of Digital Participatory Governance: Evidence from Moscow Post Office Management. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9445.
Heikkila T., Isett K.R. (2007) Citizen Involvement and Performance Management in Special-Purpose Governments//Public Administration Review. Vol. 67 (2). P. 238-248. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00710.x.
Huther J., Shah A. (2003) A Simple Measure of Good Governance//Handbook on Public Sector Performance Reviews/J. Huther, A. Shah (Eds.). The World Bank.
Irwin R.A., Stansbury J. (2004) Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort?//Public Administration Review. Vol. 64 (1). P. 55-65. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x.
Jho W., Song K.J. (2015) Institutional and Technological Determinants of Civil e-Participation: Solo or Duet?//Government Information Quarterly. Vol. 32 (4). 488-495.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.09.003.
Knack S., Kugler N., Manning N. (2003) Second-Generation Governance Indicators//International Review of Administrative Sciences. Vol. 69 (3). P. 345-364. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852303593004.
Kopackova H. (2019) Reflection of Citizens' Needs in City Strategies: The Case Study of Selected Cities of Visegrad Group Countries//Cities. Vol. 84. P. 159-171. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.08.004.
Kopackova H., Komarkova J., Horak O. (2022) Enhancing the Diffusion of e-Participation Tools in Smart Cities//Cities. Vol. 125. P. 103640. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103640.
Kweit H.G., Kwelt R.N. (1984) The Politics of Policy Analysis: The Role of Citizen Participation in Analytic Decisionsmaking//Review of Policy Research. Vol. 3 (2). P. 234-245. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1984.tb00117.x.
Lapuente V., Van de Walle S. (2020) The Effects of New Public Management on the Quality of Public Services//Governance. Vol. 33 (3). P. 461-475. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.090e.12502.
Le Blanc D. (2020) E-participation: A Quick Overview of Recent Qualitative Trends (UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA))// Working Papers. United Nations. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18356/0f898163-en.
Linders D. (2012) From e-Government to we-Government: Defining a Typology for Citizen Co-production in the Age of Social Media//Government Information Quarterly. Vol. 29 (4). P. 446-454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.093.
Lunat Z. (2008) The Internet and the Public Sphere: Evidence from Civil Society in Developing Countries//The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries. Vol. 35 (1). P. 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2008.tb00240.x.
Macintosh A. (2004) Characterizing e-Participation in Policy-Making//37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004//Proceedings of the Big Island, MI, USA. P. 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265300.
Moynihan D. (2003) Normative and Instrumental Perspectives on Public Participation Citizen Summits in Washington, D.C//American Review of Public Administration-AWER REV PUBLIC ADN. No. 33. P. 164-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074003251379.
Neshkova M.I., Guo H. (David) (2012) Public Participation and Organizational Performance: Evidence from State Agencies//Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Vol. 22 (2). P. 267-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur038.
Nesti G. (2019) Mainstreaming Gender Equality in Smart Cities: Theoretical, Methodological and Empirical Challenges//Information Polity. Vol. 24 (3). P. 289-304. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-190134.
Newcomer K.E., Hatty H.P., Wholey J.S. (Eds.) (2015) Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation//John Wiley, Sons, Inc. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781139171386.
Newig J., Challise E., Jager M.W., Kochskaemper E., Adzerson A. (2018) The Environmental Performance of Participatory and Collaborative Governance: A Framework of Causal Mechanisms//Policy Studies Journal. Vol. 46 (2). P. 269-297. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1111/pjsj.12209.
Pereira G.V., Parycek P., Falco E., Kleinhans R. (2018) Smart Governance in the Context of Smart Cities: A Literature Review//Information Polity. Vol. 23 (2). P. 143-162. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170667.
Reddick C.G., Roy J. (2013) Business Perceptions and Satisfaction with e-Government: Findings from a Canadian Survey//Government Information Quarterly. Vol. 30 (1). P. 1-9.
Rose J., Persson J.S., Heeager L.T. (2015) How e-Government Managers Priorities Rival Value Positions: The Efficiency Imperative//Information Polity. Vol. 20 (1). P. 35-59. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-150349.
Rubin D.B. (1974) Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Mourandomized Studies//Journal of Educational Psychology. No. 66. P. 688-701. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037350.
Sabo O., Rose J., Skiftemes Flak L. (2008) The Shape of Participation: Characterizing an Emerging Research Area//Government Information Quarterly. Vol. 25 (3). P. 409-428. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.04.007.
Shizazi F., Ngwenyama O., Morawczynski O. (2010) ICT Expansion and the Digital Divide in Democratic Freedoms: An Analysis of the Impact of ICT Expansion, Education and ICT Filtering on Democracy//Telematics and Informatics. Vol. 27 (1). P. 21-31. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2009.05.001.
Smorgunov L. (2021) Governability and a Technocratic Approach to Government as a Platform: Critics Using the Russian Case//International Journal of Electronic Governance. Vol. 13 (1). P. 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/JIGE.2021.114298.
Speer J. (2012) Participatory Governance Reform: A Good Strategy for Increasing Government Responsiveness and Improving Public Services?//World Development. Vol. 40 (12). P. 2379-2398.
Stivers C. (1998) The Public Agency as Polls: Active Citizenship in the Administrative State//Administration, Society. Vol. 22 (1). P. 86-105. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1177/009539979002208105.
Tambouris E., Liotas N., Tarabanis K. (2007) A Framework for Assessing eParticipation Projects and Tools. 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07). P. 90-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2007.13.
Thomas J.C. (1995) Public Participation in Public Decisions: New Skills and Strategies for Public Managers. Wiley.
Tolbert C.J., Mossberger K. (2006) The Effects of E-Government on Trust and Confidence in Government//Public Administration Review. Vol. 66 (3). P. 354-369. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00594.x.
Walle S. (2005) Measuring Bureaucratic Quality in Governance Indicators. https://www.seman-ticscholar.org/paper/Measuring-bureaucratic-quality-in-governance-Walle/7311795a14959b311dc5dd0f65cdde36dda74e3a.
Xu Y. (2017) Generalized Synthetic Control Method: Causal Inference with Interactive Fixed Effects Models//Political Analysis. Vol. 25 (1). P. 57-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2016.2.
Yang K., Rho S.-Y. (2007) E-Government for Better Performance: Promises, Realities, and Challenges//International Journal of Public Administration. Vol. 30 (11). P. 1197-1217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690701225556.
