Закономерности локальной активности населения: социологический пересмотр городской пространственной структуры
Аннотация
Статья нацелена на раскрытие и описание ранее опускаемых элементов городской пространственной структуры — локальных субцентров в ареалах безразличия. Большинство современных работ, посвященных изучению организации городского пространства, фокусируются на выявлении крупных ядер без учета межъядерных пространств. Для обоснования существования и значимости таких форм городского пространства применяется видоизмененная модель Высоковского, в том числе социологический подход как полевой опрос в границах полигона исследования. Для описания пространственного поведения местных жителей конструируется двухпараметрическая концептуальная рамка, позволяющая классифицировать товары и сервисы. Полученная репрезентация поляризации локальной активности демонстрирует необходимость большего внимания к периферийных зонам, ранее рассматриваемым в качестве гомогенных.
Скачивания
Литература
Alyapkina A.V. (2019) Prostranstvenno-vremennye zakonomernosti v razmeshchenii i funktsionirovanii tsentrov aktivnosti v g. Moskve [Spatiotemporal dependencies of activity centers placement and functioning in the city of Moscow]. Master’s dissertation, Moscow.
Anas A., Arnott R., Small K.A. (1998) Urban Spatial Structure. Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 36, no 3, pp. 1426–1464.
Anderson N.B., Bogart W.T. (2001) The Structure of Sprawl: Identifying and Characterizing Employment Centers in Polycentric Metropolitan Areas. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, vol. 60, no 1, pp. 147–169.
Anselin L. (1995) Local Indicators of Spatial Association — Lisa. Geographical Analysis, vol. 27, no 2, pp. 93–115.
Brade I., Axenov K., Bondarchuk E. (2007) The Transformation of Urban Space in Post-soviet Russia. London: Taylor & Francis.
Burger M., Meijers E. (2012) Form Follows Function? Linking Morphological and Functional Polycentricity. Urban Studies, vol. 49, no 5, pp. 1127–1149.
Burgess E.W. (1924) The Growth of the City: On Introduction to a Research Project. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Christaller W. (1966) Central Places in Southern Germany / C. W. Baskin (trans.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Craig S. G., Ng P.T. (2001) Using Quantile Smoothing Splines to Identify Employment Subcenters in a Multicentric Urban Area. Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 49, no 1, pp. 100–120.
Djolov G. (2013) The Herfindahl-Hirschman index as a decision guide to business concentration: A statistical exploration. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, vol. 38, no 3, pp. 201–227.
Em P.P. (2017) Bol’shoj gorod kak samostojatel’naja sistema tsentral’nykh mest (na premere Moskvy) [Big city as an independent system of central places (on the example of Moscow)], Regional’nye issledovaniya [Regional Studies], no 3, pp. 34–42. (in Russian)
Em P.P. (2018) Razvitije sistemy tsentral’nykh mest moskovskogo stolichnogo regiona v postsovetskij period [Development of Central Place System of Moscow’s capital region in Post-Soviet Period]. Regional’nye issledovaniya [Regional Studies], no 4, pp. 75–83. (in Russian)
Filanova T.V. (2008) Formirovanije lokal’nykh sotsial’no-territorial’nykh obrazovanij v krupnejshem slozhivshemsya gorode (na primere g. Samary) [Formation of local socio-territorial formations in the largest established city (on the example of the city of Samara)]. Doctoral dissertation, St. Petersburg. (in Russian)
Gaikova L.V. (2015) Politsentrizm kak paradigma razvitija rossijskikh gorodov [Polycentricity as Russian cities’ development paradigm]. Teorija arkhitektury [Theory of architecture], no 2, pp. 69–81. (in Russian)
Garcia-López M.À. (2010) Population Suburbanization in Barcelona, 1991–2005: Is Its Spatial Structure Changing? Journal of Housing Economics, vol. 19, no 2, pp. 119–132.
Getis A., Ord J.K. (1992) The Analysis of Spatial Association by Use of Distance Statistics. Geographical Analysis, vol. 24, no 3, pp. 113–136.
Giuliano G., Small K. A. (1991) Subcenters in the Los Angeles region. Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 21, no 2, pp. 163–182.
Goncharov R.V., Gudz T.V. (2023) Modeli gorodskoy politsentrichnosti: kompleksnyj instrument obosnovanija reshenij o gorodskom razvitii [Models of urban polycentricity: complex tool for urban development solutions justification]. A.A. Vysokovsky Forum [Conference presentation]. Available at: https://youtu.be/J-GUlD0Mbrc?t=1863 (accessed: 18.08.2024). (in Russian)
Goncharov R.V., Nikogosyan K.S. (2017) Vyyavleniye tsentrov aktivnosti v gorode: sopostavleniye obyektivnukh I kognitivnykh dannykh [Detection of activity centers in the city: objective and cognitive data comparison]. XVII April International Conference on Economic and Social Development. In 4 books. Book 1. NRU HSE, pp. 333–342. (in Russian)
Gostev M.V. (2018) Ob evristicheskoy prirode modelej evolyutsionnogo gorodskogo razvitiya [On the Heuristic Nature of Evolutionary Urban Development Models], Gorodskiye issledovaniya i praktiki [Urban Studies and Practices], vol. 3, no 1, pp. 7–22. (in Russian)
Gostev M.V. (2022) Neravnomerno-rayonirovannaya model’ goroda: istoki — razvitije — primenenije — vliyanije [Irregular Areas Urban Model: Genesis — Evolution — Application — Influence], Gorodskiye issledovaniya i praktiki [Urban Studies and Practices], vol. 7, no 1, pp. 106–125. (in Russian)
Gostev M.V. (2023) Vyjavleniye planirovochnoj spetsifiki stolitsy v materialah kontseptsii perspektivnogo razvitija Moskvy 1986 goda A.E. Gutnova [Revealing the Planning Specificity of Moscow in Gutnov’s 1986 Perspective Development Conception]. Gorodskije issledovaniya i praktiki [Urban Studies and Practices], vol. 7, no 4, pp. 54–67. (in Russian)
Green N. (2007) Functional Polycentricity: A Formal Definition in terms of Social Network Analysis. Urban Studies, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 2077–2103.
Gutnov A.E. (1984) Evoljucija gradostroitel’stva [Urban Planning Evolution]. Moscow: Strojizdat. (in Russian)
Gutnov A.E. (1985) Sistemnyj podhod v izuchenii goroda: osnovanija i kontury teorii gorodskogo razvitija [Systematic approach to urban studies: basement and contours of urban development theory]. Sistemnye issledovanija. Metodologicheskie problemy [System Studies. Methodological Problems]. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 211–232. (in Russian)
Harris C.D., Ullman E.L. (1945) The Nature of Cities. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 242, pp. 7–17.
Horton F.E., Reynolds D.R. (1971) Effects of Urban Spatial Structure on Individual Behavior. Economic geography, vol. 47, no 1, pp. 36–48.
Huff D.L. (1963) A Probabilistic Analysis of Shopping Center Trade Areas. Land Economics, vol. 39, no 1, pp. 81–90.
Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskaya geografiya: ponyatiya I terminy. Slovar’-spravochnik [Human Geography: concepts and terms. Encyclopedic dictionary] (2013) / Ed. by A.P. Gorkin. Smolensk: Oecumene. (in Russian)
Jaume M.T. (2012) Towards a Methodology to Identify and Characterize Urban Sub-Centers: Employment Entropy Information Versus Employment Density. RSA European Conference, pp. 1–38.
Kotov E.A. (2017) Gorodskaya politsentrichnost’ na osnove tochek prityazheniya [Urban polycentricity based on points of interest]. Data & Science 2017 [Conference presentation]. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccMpN7ZihLo (accessed: 15.08.2024). (in Russian)
Kotov E.A., Goncharov R.V., Novikov A.V., Nikogosyan K.S., Gorodnichev A.V. (2016) Moskva: kurs na policentrichnost’. Ocenka ehffektov gradostroitel’nyh proektov na policentricheskoe razvitie Moskvy [Moscow: Direction to the Polycentricity. Urban Planning Projects Effects Evaluation on the Polycentric Moscow Development]. Moscow: HSE Publishing House. (in Russian)
Lynch K. (1960) The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McDonald J.F. (1987) The Identification of Urban Employment Subcenters. Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 21, no 2, pp. 242–258.
McDonald J.F., McMillen D.P. (1990) Employment Subcenters and Land Values in a Polycentric Urban Area: The Case of Chicago. Environment and Planning A, vol. 22, no 12, pp. 1561–1574.
McDonald J.F., Prather P.J. (1994) Suburban Employment Centers: The Case of Chicago. Urban Studies, vol. 31, no 2, pp. 201–218.
McMillen D.P. (2001a) Nonparametric Employment Subcenter Identification. Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 50, no 3, pp. 448–473.
McMillen D.P. (2001b) Polycentric Urban Structure: The Case of Milwaukee. Economic Perspectives-Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, vol. 25, no 2, pp. 15–27.
McMillen D.P., Lester T.W. (2003) Evolving Subcenters: Employment and Population Densities in Chicago, 1970–2020. Journal of Housing Economics, vol. 12, no 1, pp. 60–81.
McMillen D.P., Smith S.C. (2003) The Number of Subcenters in Large Urban Areas. Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 53, no 3, pp. 321–338.
Oldenburg R. (1989) The Great Good Place: Cafés, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community. New York: Paragon House.
Palan N. (2010) Measurement of Specialization the Choice of Indices (No. 62). FIW working paper.
Parfyonova D.V. (2020) Faktory formirovaniya tsentrov nochnoy aktivnosti v Moskve [Factors of night activity centers formation in Moscow]. Master’s dissertation, Moscow.
Ram S., Jung H.S. (1990) The Conceptualization and Measurement of Product Usage, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 18, pp. 67–76.
Redfearn C.L. (2007) The Topography of Metropolitan Employment: Identifying Centers of Employment in a Polycentric Urban Area. Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 61, no 3, pp. 519–541.
Rodoman B.B. (1999) Territorial’nye arealy i seti. Ocherki teoreticheskoj geografii [Territorial Areas and Networks. Theoretical Geography Essays]. Smolensk: Ojkumena. (in Russian)
Schönfelder S., Axhausen K.W. (2004a) On the Variability of Human Activity Spaces. The Real and Virtual Worlds of Spatial Planning. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 237–262.
Schönfelder S., Axhausen K.W. (2004b) Structure and Innovation of Human Activity Spaces. Full length manuscript for ISTTT 16. October 2004. Zurich.
Shearmur R., Coffey W.J. (2002) A Tale of Four Cities: Intrametropolitan Employment Distribution in Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, and Ottawa–Hull, 1981–1996. Environment and Planning A, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 575–598.
Timmermans H., Van Der Heijden R., Westerveld H. (1982) A Tale of Four Cities: Intrametropolitan Employment Distribution in Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, and Ottawa–Hull. Geoforum, vol. 13, no 1, pp. 27–37.
Von Thünen I. (1926) Izolirovannoje gosudarstvo [Isolated State]. Moscow: Ekonomicheskaja zhizn’ [Economic Life]. (in Russian)
Vysokovsky A.A. (1986) Prostranstvennoe prognozirovanie zastrojki slozhivshihsja gorodov [Spatial Forecast of Urban Development]. Moscow: CNTI po grazhdanskomu stroitel’stvu i arhitekture. (in Russian)
Vysokovsky A.A. (1997) Round table “Teoreticheskiye modeli prostranstvennoj organizatsii goroda i vozmozhnye strategii razvitiya gorodov v sovremennykh usloviyakh [Theoretic models of urban spatial organization and possible strategies of city development under modern conditions]”. NIITAG. [Electronic version]. Available at: http://emsu.ru/extra/htm4s/um/1998/1/3-2.htm (accessed: 20.08.2024). (in Russian)
Vysokovsky A.A. (2005) Pravila zemlepol’zovanija i zastrojki: rukovodstvo po razrabotke. Opyt vvedenija pravovogo zonirovanija v Kyrgyzstane [Zoning Ordinance: Development Manual. Zoning Implantation Experience in Kyrgyzstan]. Bishkek: Ega-Basma. (in Russian)
Vysokovsky A.A. (2015) Udobnyj gorod: tri urovnya sozidanija [Comfortable City: Three Levels of Creation]. Vysokovsky A.A.: Sobr. soch. v 3 tomah [Collected Works: In 3 Volumes]. Vol. 3. Public. M.: Grey Matter, pp. 18–21. (in Russian)
Yabe, T., García Bulle Bueno, B., Frank, M. R., Pentland, A., & Moro, E. (2024). Behaviour-based dependency networks between places shape urban economic resilience. Nature Human Behaviour.
Xu Y., Shaw S.L., Zhao Z., Yin L., Lu F., Chen J., Fang Z., Li Q. (2018) Another Tale of Two Cities: Understanding Human Activity Space Using Actively Tracked Cellphone Location Data. Geographies of mobility. London: Routledge, pp. 246–258.
Zaichkowsky J.L. (1985) Familiarity: Product Use, Involvement or Expertise? Advances in consumer research. Association for Consumer Research, vol. 12, no 1, pp. 296–299.